PETER SAUL @ Leo Koening Inc. Recent Works - Part 2 - The Works of Peter Saul
I covered the introduction to Peter Saul in Part 1 of PETER SAUL @ Leo Koening Inc. Recent Works - see the post in conjunction with this one.
Peter Saul’s work draws on Politics and Art History (among other things)….I asked Peter Saul if he thought his paintings were “political”.  Peter answered…”Yes” he things art should be political - should make a statement (maybe those are my words - I don’t remember his exact words to me..but that was the gist of it …stir things up….that’s part of what Art is for).
The Political Part …. hmm .. I guess you can say this painting about George Bush at Abu Ghraib does make a political statement…..Â
“Bush at Abu Gharib” needs no explanation, according to Peter Saul. I might add that George W. Bush has his hand up what looks to be a camal’s shot up face is a clear statement, by the artist, that George Bush is personally responsible for the mess in Iraq - it’s his hand up the shot up nose and the exposed brains - it’s Bush’s fault - the whole thing. Bush even put the noose on the person/camel’s neck ….. want to know why the war is a mess - just look at the picture - who’s face is there. Interesting, the eyes don’t look at you - they look at the camel, kinda.
It’s a large painting - just like the rest in the show.
Sardanapalus, painting in 2005, is a statement calling back to Delacroix’s painting “Death of Sardanaplaus”, painted in 1827. I know all about Delacroix, let’s leave it at that.
Delacroix - Death of Sardanaplaus - 1827
“The tangle of bodies and vivid colors combine sensuality with violent death. The painting was based on a play by English romantic poet Lord Byron.”
Ok, and now here’s Peter Saul’s version….20 minutes later - after the deed was done.
Sardanapalus, 2005, 78 x 86 inches, Peter Saul - care of Leo Koening Inc.
According to Peter Saul “Sardanapalus pays homage to Delacroix imagined, but 20 minutes later; the great bed is n fire and the king’s dead body has been decapitated by his former guards, the better to remove his personal jewelry”.
So….all the “servents” were just interested in the King’s Jewelry, which Saul puts great detail into painting. In my third post I’ll put in my photos and personal thoughts…but I want to cover the rest of the works in this post, post #2 of the series. BTW, Peter Saul stays himself, just the way it should be…he may admire Delacroix - but out of his brush - comes Peter Saul, 100% - just as it should be.
The Execution of Jesus, 2006, is another one of Saul’s paintings that is very “political”.
While Peter Saul did not comment directly on this painting in his “To the Viewer” introduction, in the catelog of his work - he did address the overall question he’s trying to answer in his work.
 ”Politics, Propaganda and Pornography are the 3 other things my pictures need if I’m going to have any hope of connecting with a vibrant, healthy art world that craves thrills and chills. Of course there’s the “other art world” (much more intelligent) I never think about except to make fun of. I have this intellectual theory that it’s only fair play. If most artists paint the good stuff, I need to paint the bad stuff, to help create balance. Like with armies, if one side ahs all the takes and places, it’s not fair”.
I’m thinking of the Star Trek episode where Kirk arms the population of a peaceful planet with shotguns because the Romulans are doing the same thing.Â
In fact, the whole thrust of Peter Saul’s paintings orginate in arguement that’s already been won - in favor of Art. No one argues about Politics, Propaganda or Pornography are part of Art, or his right to include them…. these were concerns of Saul’s generation but the tide has turned - Saul is now an established master of American Art - not a renegade - as he likes to refer to himself.
In terms of what you can learn from Peter Saul’s painting today …. he’s a master artist - with a powerful command of his own technique - vision. That’s why he’ll be remembered and how he’ll be remembered.
In the last post, I’ll give my ideas about Peter Saul’s technique and pictures of the Opening @ Leo Koening Inc.







[…] Playstation Portable « PETER SAUL @ Leo Koening Inc. Recent Works - Part 2 - The Works of Peter Saul […]
By PETER SAUL @ Leo Koening Inc. Recent Works - Part 3 - Technique and My Photos » Art NYC - Fine Arts in New York City on October 21st, 2006 at 6:19 pm
Marshall, I wonder about your thoughts on the women depicted in the Delacroix and the Saul since women are often elemental in your own art.
By Robyn McMaster on October 22nd, 2006 at 10:11 am
Really! I had not thought of it that way Robyn. I guess Woman are elemental in my work. Without the human element in the work, some where, there’s not as much interest (I know people will argue about that statement).
I mean, if I were a “rabbit” I’d look at a landscape (if I could see it - being so close to the ground) entirely differently than a human being …..I’d probably not care if humans were in it for not (except they’d be shooting at me ….maybe….). People need other people … art is a story.
By Marshall on October 22nd, 2006 at 4:25 pm
It’s amazing how much we think alike, Marshall. People very much need each other and art is story.
I was going to explore the piece from today’s New York Times on the the affects of Alzheimer’s on a painter’s art and then I visited your site to see you have already done it. I still may explore it with a very different take.
By Robyn McMaster on October 25th, 2006 at 12:31 am
[…] Went over to David Nolan Gallery on Broadway, in Soho, to see the other show of Peter Saul’s work that opened last Thursday.  I would much rather write about paintings I see personally - I need the personal contact to do my best work. I covered the Leo Koenig opening last Friday in part 1, part 2 and part 3 last week. […]
By More Peter Saul paintings @ David Nolan Gallery » Art NYC - Fine Arts in New York City on October 26th, 2006 at 4:14 am