I went over to the tail end of the Blurries event tonight because a friend of mine, Maurizio Fionda, asked me to and I had a good time - it’s part of Internet Week that’s just ending on Tuesday (today) and here’s a video I made for my friend, Maurizio, of the event.

I want to start out this post by admitting that when I was younger I studied books like The Painter’s Secret Geometry: A Study of Composition in Art by Charles Bouleau - it’s currently out of print and costs several hundred dollars to get your hand on a copy (wish I had saved mine - don’t take good care of books - and had I still had a copy of Charles Bouleau’s book, it would not be worth much in the condition I keep books). I also read Cezanne’s Secret Composition Cézanne’s Composition: Analysis of His Form with Diagrams and Photographs of His Motifs by Earl Loran and some of the Barnes Collection of books and even the Jane Roberts book about the Channeled Cezanne messages.

But, at this point in my life, while all that information is valuable, very interesting, and some of it helpful, none of it really explains the mystery of what makes Cezanne’s paintings great, or Manet’s exquisite feelings - because there are things in Art that can not be explained - Art is a mystery - and if anyone could fully explain it, it would cease to a mystery and not be as interesting to behold and live with.

All these books are useful - and they added to my vocabulary - even Sidney Geist’s book on Interperting Cezanne (I met Sidney Geist at the Vermont Studio School and spent a few evenings talking with him there and in NYC, but 20 years ago) - but none of them truly explain the mystery of his work - even as they try to.

Recently i was contacted by Dewain Boyce; he’s got a site dedicated to Cezanne’s Geometry. We’ve had a spirited exchange of emails - and while I believe Cezanne used geometry as explained in the above sources in a conscious and deliberate way - if that was all he did - his work would not have survived and been as influential as it has.

That’s my belief.

Being an artist myself, sometimes feeling inspiration, sometimes knowing and other times, channeling something beyond myself - I can comprehend and contain that Cezanne knew a great deal - and yet, let himself be guided by forces beyond his own conscious understanding - and it’s the combination of the two that makes his work so great.

But, suppose I totally understood everything Paul Cezanne did in his paintings - intellectually .. what good would it do me? Cezanne is himself and I’m me - I can’t copy someone else - no one should - the answers for one are not for another - each creator needs to find their own path.

So, what I would say to Dewain, and others, so inspired by Geometry, is remember that Art, above all, is still a Mystery - and no system can fully explain it - the best an artist can do is “contain” the self control and mastery along with an openness to unexpected.

And some of the Ghosts in The Forest Dewain Boyce writes about were probably channeled - the effect of being overshadowed by presences and energies Cezanne hardly understood - but was a channel for.

That’s what I believe - but that’s only since I’ve painted and felt presences and known that as much as I can know, there’s things that just “are” beyond understanding.

Sounds more wild than in was - we were looking at Art - though I admit, most of it could not be viewed in my video because it was night.

If there’s anyplace that rivals NYC for meetups and art events, it’s probably San Francisco - certainly that is true for technical events though I think we have much more Art Activity in NYC.

Here’s the video, such as it is, that I took last night as I took a walk in what I think was Golden Gate Park with @Jdersh , now a fellow Board Member of the Web Analytics Association: